Total Enttäuschendes aus Dänemark :(

Genitalverstümmelung wird jetzt auch noch zum Menschenrecht geadelt - natürlich nur, wenn sie Jungen betrifft.

Zitat

Danish government agrees that circumcision is a human right

Zitat

Despite the vast majority of the Danish population being in favour of banning the circumcision of boys, the Danish government has accepted that it will not be passing any legislation on the issue.
In a report to the UN regarding human rights issues in Denmark, the government has agreed with an Egyptian contention that it is a human right for parents to be able to circumcise their male children.

Ägypten, wo auch am laufenden Band Mädchen verstümmelt werden....
Da kennt man sich natürlich aus mit Menschenrechten!

Zitat

A YouGov survey from 2014 showed that about three out of every four Danes were against the circumcision of boys.

Es braucht mehr direkte Demokratie in Europa, anders geht es nicht bei solchen Kinder- und Volksverrätern.

Zitat

“It’s grotesque,” said LA spokesperson Merete Riisager. “It’s not a human right to cut into one’s children. It is a human right, however, to wait until a person is an adult and can decide for themselves.”

http://cphpost.dk/news/danish-go…uman-right.html

Zitat

In 2015, Denmark decided to delete its registry of circumcised individuals, reports the Local.

Zitat

The basis is that circumcision of boys is rarely associated with medical complications, when performed under medical supervision...

Na ja, manchmal stirbt ein Kind daran, aber was soll's? Ist ja nur ein Junge, und vor allem:

Zitat

it's viewed as a religious expression and therefore falls under the freedom of religion right.

http://nordic.businessinsider.com/the-danish-gov…inst-it-2016-6/

Und diese Kinderverräter von Venstre sind garantiert zu 98% genital vollständig.
Wasser predigen, Wein trinken.

Zitat von Bela2012

Hast Du was anderes erwartet?

Ich erwarte von Volksvertretern, dass sie das Volk vertreten.

Wenn eine Regierung das genaue Gegenteil von dem beschliesst, was 3/4 des Volkes will, und dazu noch pervers wird (MGM sei ein Menschenrecht) - dann ver-tritt sie tatsächlich das Volk - in den Arsch.
Und dann gibt es Leute, die sich über "Politikverdrossenheit" wundern...

Zitat von R2D2

Diese verschissenen Feiglinge

Genau das wollte ich eigentlich auch schreiben. Aber du hast Recht, warum soll man sie nicht als das titulieren, was sie sind?

Das ist ein schwerer Rückschlag für Kinderrechte und die Geschlechtergerechtigkeit.

Zitat von Dagmar Rehak Wien

Das überlege ich mir schon lange, jemanden, der Zwangsverstümmelungen befürwortet, ebenfalls zwangszuverstümmeln.

Das wäre so ein Art Scharia-Recht. Unrecht mit Unrecht vergelten.
Die Richter würden dich problemlos verknacken, denn Erwachsene oder andere Leute Kinder "das ist ja ganz was anderes".
Aber die EIGENEN Kinder, die gehören einem doch, da kann man doch wohl so einiges mit machen, auch mit den Genitlalien, zumindest, wenn es Jungen sind!

Zitat von Bela2012

Es ist ein langer Weg

Leider muss man seit einigen Jahren (Schweden, Deutschland, Norwegen, und jetzt Dänemark) den Eindruck haben - es geht einen Schritt vor, und zwei Schritte zurück. Zurück - in Richtung Bronzezeit.

Offenbar stehen die kleinen Jungen für die dänische Regierung noch unter den Schweinen und Rindviechern, denn da konnte man ja tatsächlich mal eine religiöse Tradition verbieten.

Zitat

has agreed with an Egyptian contention

Was soll das sein?

Meinen die damit die "Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam"?

Zitat

Various Muslim countries had criticized the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights for its failure to take into account the cultural and religious context of non-Western countries.[2] In 1981, Said Rajaie-Khorassani—the post-revolutionary Iranian representative to the UN—articulated the position of his country regarding the UDHR, by saying that it was a relativistic "secular understanding of the Judeo-Christian tradition", which could not be implemented by Muslims without trespassing Islamic law

Zitat

In 1992, the CDHRI was presented to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, where it was strongly condemned by the International Commission of Jurists.[/url].

Zitat

The CDHRI was adopted in 1990 by members of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference. It has been signed by 45 states so far.

Möchte Dänemark da mit bei sein?

Zitat

Circumcision of boys will therefore remain legal as it complies with Danish law and is carried out by a doctor.

Aber wenn es um Mädchen geht, dann wehrt man sich vehement gegen jegliche Medikalisierung, selbst wenn es "nur" um einen "Nick" geht:

The sickening trend of medicalised FGM

Zitat

In February this year a controversial study published in the Journal of Medical Ethics in the US suggested that ‘nicking’ the genitals of young girls, under anaesthetic might be preferable to an outright ban.
Arguing that criminalising FGM pushes the practice underground the authors suggested legally permitting a minimal form of mutilation ‘in recognition of its cultural and religious obligations’.
The suggestion was lambasted by survivors and campaigners who referred to a similar proposal by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in 2010 suggesting paediatricians could offer a ‘ritual nick’ as a way of reaching families in practising communities. The AAP eventually withdrew the briefing paper.

Beim Guardian ist man jetzt offenbar vorsichtiger geworden uns lässt keine Kommentare mehr bei "heiklen" Themen zu - könnte ja jemand Vergleiche zu MGM ziehen!

Merke: bei Mädchen ist es immer "mutilation", selbst als "minimal form". Bei Jungen nie.

Und hier muss es ja nicht mal ein Doktor machen...

Zitat

Contrary to claims that circumcision in males is unproblematic, however, a Danish study
published in the International Journal of Epidemiology in 2011 finds
that circumcision leads to frequent orgasm difficulties in Danish men.
The study also finds that women who are the sexual partners of
circumcised men also have significantly higher orgasm difficulties, more
problems with painful intrcourse (dyspareunia), and more often feel a
sense a incomplete fulfillment of sexual needs.

Alles anzeigen

Augen zu und durch!

http://nordic.businessinsider.com/the-danish-gov…inst-it-2016-6/

Dabei hatte Mikkel Andersson vor fünf Tagen in der Berlingske doch alles so schön erklärt (Google Übersetzung):

Zitat

Banning circumcision is equality

By Mikkel Andersson, journalist and commentator
June 10, 2016, 20:00

No contest, no matter how much female circumcision is done in the best sense and might even be appreciated by the circumcision itself - then it is of course a choice that parents can not take on a child's behalf. Therefore, you should make it quite obvious and simple and undramatic provide boys and girls exactly the same legal protection body

So we once again come to the time of year when circumcision debate flares up. It's not exactly an uplifting topic, but it is nevertheless fine, it happens.

The debate return guarantees that Denmark with gradually increasing steps approaching the day when Denmark introduces equality in terms of boys and girls children's right to something as basic as the right to decide over their own bodies.

It actually requires only that lawmakers remove the word 'female' from the Penal Code section 245a - circumcision clause - which reads: "Whoever by a legemsangreb with or without the consent cuts away or otherwise removing the female genitalia whole or in part, be punished with imprisonment up 6 years. "

Of course, girls and boys have exactly the same right not to remove the external genitalia without consent and medical cause.

Often, it seems, the defenders of the right of parents circumcision of boys is bound to encounter in explanations of why it is incredibly understandable that it is illegal to cut parts of girls' sex, while the other hand is a God-given right (in either literal or transferred sense) to cut parts of the boys genetalier. A parent freedom that finally can not be restricted, you have to understand.

But when - often women - make female genital mutilation around
around it is of course also genuinely meaningful for them and made the best of intentions. Just as the male circumcision is to Jews and Muslims. Male circumcision performed also typical of people - mostly men - who themselves have been done, and who see it as both necessary, harmless and extremely large identity-bearing value.

The analogy is one to one.

Several defenders of circumcision of boys will then argue that FGM is far more brutal. But it is based on an often false analogy when comparing the most brutal forms of female genital mutilation, typically the so-called infibulation, the most "light" and less risky male.

But if one example comparator ritual boy circumcision in South Africa conducted under relatively primitive conditions (here died 32 boys alone in the summer of 2015) with a circumcision of girls on a Malaysian private hospital dedicated to the cutting of the clitoris' 'foreskin' in a relatively limited extent and under sterile conditions, see the comparison somewhat different. But it does not, for all recognize the obvious and fortunately that female genital mutilation is unacceptable no matter what.

No contest, no matter how much female circumcision is done in the best sense and might even be appreciated by the circumcision itself - as is the case certainly has been for millions who have continued the practice - then it is of course a choice that parents can take at a child's behalf.

Therefore, you should make it quite obvious and quite simple and undramatic provide boys and girls exactly the same legal protection of the body until they can decide.

Harder it is actually not.

Alles anzeigen

http://www.b.dk/kommentarer/fo…er-ligestilling