GB: "wounding with intent and...causing actual bodily harm"

Quote

Rogue circumcision ‘doctors’ are on the rise in Britain

Dieses mal ein Mohammed Alazawi.

Quote

It is likely that these cases represent only a fraction of the total number of instances where child circumcision goes wrong.

Nicht nur das. Jede nicht indizierte Genitalverminderung bei Kindern ist "wrong".

Jede ist "wounding with intent and...causing actual bodily harm"

https://unherd.com/newsroom/rogue…ise-in-britain/

Quote from careappointments

The judge observed that the appellant had not only deceived parents into thinking that he was a specialist surgeon, but he had also lied to the pharmacy in order to obtain the medication, signing for drugs as ‘Dr Alazawi

Quote

The judge said that this deception had gone on ‘for years’ and that although the jury had heard from only a few families at trial, the appellant’s diaries showed he had performed ‘hundreds of circumcisions each year

Quote

She also said that the circumcisions were performed “for religious reasons rather than any medical need” and were often done without proper sanitation and with an untrained assistant who was “often a teenager”.

Und dann hat er auch als er auf Kaution frei war versucht seinen Arzneimittelbestand wieder aufzufüllen (wollte wohl weiter verstümmeln/verpfuschen?) und auch noch versucht sich dünne zu machen.

Aber trotz und alledem hatte er in der Berufung eine verständnisvolle Richterin und bekam seine Strafe um drei Jahre reduziert.

Quote from 5Pillars

The Court emphatically did not outlaw the practice. Instead, Lady Justice May, Mr Justice Saini and His Honour Judge Picton reaffirmed that religious male circumcision continues to be recognised as a lawful exception to the general criminal prohibition on intentionally inflicting bodily harm....

The judges acknowledged that English law has long recognised religious circumcision as lawful, despite the absence of a statutory regulatory framework governing non-medical practitioners.

Na, dann ist ja alles in Butter! Man darf Jungen ruhig Schaden (harm) zufügen, ist halt eine Ausnahme!

Penisverstümmler können also ruhig weiterverstümmeln, nur dürfen sie nicht behaupten sie wären Ärzte und das Lokalanästhetikum müssen sie auch weg lassen, weil das dürfen sie nicht.

Dann tut es halt noch mehr weh, aber die Richter sind wohl "schmerzbefreit".