Our data doesn’t support the presence of long-term complications. Nevertheless...

  • Zitat

    Despite the vast literature on the harmful effects of genital surgies (El-Defrawi, Lofty, Dandash, Refaat & Evada, 2001; Larsen & Okonofua, 2002) our data doesn’t support the presence of long-term complications. Nevertheless, even if in our study FGM did not present risks of physical harm, it is a violation of women’s human rights.
    The suppression and the control of women’s sexuality through the mutilation of their genitals are demeaning to women as they deny an aspect of their humanity. In addiction, the present study should be replicated on a larger sample to determine the association between type of circumcision and physical-psychosexual complications. We should help men and women coming from these cultures to understand that. They may change a tradition without losing their values and their identity.

    Man sieht wieder, die ein Studie sagt dies, die andere das.

    "it is a violation of women’s human rights" Und warum nicht der von Männern auch?

    https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Saulo_…d659494ef9b.pdf

    Indeed, as the history of female circumcision suggests, if male circumcision
    were confined to developing nations, it would by now have emerged as an in-
    ternational cause celebre, stirring passionate opposition from feminists, physicians, politicians, and the global human rights community. If routine medical
    circumcision didn't exist today, no one would dare to invent it.

    David Gollaher

Jetzt mitmachen!

Sie haben noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registrieren Sie sich kostenlos und nehmen Sie an unserer Community teil!