Irgendwie mussten ja die statistische Quote von 10 % beschnittene Männer und Jungen in Deutschland ja zusammenkommen.
Also wird jeder dritte Junge (bzw. männliche Mensch) in Deutschland im Laufe seines Lebens in einer medizinischen Einrichtung beschnitten, hinzu kommen rituelle Beschneidungen (Weniger als 7 % sind Muslimen oder Juden, davon sind aber sicher auch einige in medizinischen Einrichtungen beschnitten und andere vielleicht auch gar nicht).
Die als Verstümmelungspropagandisten einschlägig bekannten Morris, Klausner, Tobian usw. schrieben 2016:
Percentage of circumcised males in each of the 237 countries and territories in the world:
Germany 6.7
Das ist anscheinend wie Kaffeesatz lesen.
Eine andere Studie, Zirkumzisionen in Krankenhäusern in Deutschland:
There were 122,431 operations on the male prepuce included between 2005 and 2017, which equals 9418 (95% confidence interval: 8860–10,029) procedures per year. The majority of these operations were circumcisions, of which 4977 (95% confidence interval: 4676–5337) were performed annually
Although ritual circumcisions should in theory not be conducted within the health-care system, it is likely that they are present [44]. Their relevance has been quantified in data from England based on the comparison with the expected incidence of phimosis [28]. Based on the report that in a German cohort of 176 boys treated for phimosis by an office-based paediatric surgeon, the decision for treatment was based on a non-retractable preputium [36], and taking into account that a non-retractable foreskin is present in 50% of first-graders [45], it is unclear how many circumcisions were performed for therapeutic reasons.
Ein ganze Menge!
| Age group | Mean | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| < 1 | 621 | 572–688 |
| 1–4 | 2430 | 2310–2590 |
| 5–9 | 1330 | 1230–1480 |
| 10–14 | 383 | 370–415 |
| 15–19 | 207 | 197–221 |
Non-medically indicated circumcision in boys in Germany can be performed explicitly by discretion of parental custody since 2013. In the first six months of life, circumcision may be performed by non-physicians if this person is designated to do so by a religious community [46]. Consequently, the latter cases will not be represented within our data if there is no immediate major complication that required therapy on an inpatient basis. Currently, there is no estimate on the number of these procedures conducted by non-physicians without adequate anaesthesia [47]. This might be a general issue due to, perceived, profanity of topics like circumcisions, exemplified by unpublished theses with relatively large cohorts examining the efficacy of local steroids [38, 39], whereas small cases series with single digit numbers of patients still easily appear in the international literature if they present something novel or deal with more prestigious diseases [48]. This is important in so far, as truly representative cohort studies found a more than doubled prevalence of circumcision in boys from families with a migrant background and even a more than tripled prevalence in those from Turkish families [24]. This suggests that ritual circumcisions frequently occur.