Ganz andere Häute

Das musste ja kommen:
Hier postuliert ein Mr. Jacobs. dass die Zerstörung der Penis-Vorhaut natürlich ganz was anderes ist als die Zerstörung der Klitoris-Vohaut ist. Dass man das erstere nicht verbieten kann, das zweite schon.
Das wäre keine Diskriminierung.
Und wie wichtig und wohltuend Religion für die Gesellschaft ist....

https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/journals/…article-p77.xml

Merkwürdigerweise war Jacobs 2016 noch deutlich anderer Meinung:

Zitat

Category 1 includes procedures that should almost never have
a lasting effect on morphology or function if performed prop-
erly. A small nick in the vulvar skin fits into this category.
Category 2 consists of procedures that create morphological
changes, but are not expected to have an adverse effect on
reproduction or on the sexual satisfaction of the woman or her
partner. Examples include surgical retraction of the clitoral
hood or procedures resembling elective labiaplasty as performed
in Western nations. Surgical resection of the clitoral hood is the
vulvar procedure that most closely resembles male circumcision

Alles anzeigen

Zitat

While any proced-
ure is associated with several predictable short-term risks
(namely bleeding and infection), the long-term sequelae should
be rare for Category 1 and Category 2 procedures. In a WHO
study, there were no statistically significant differences in health
outcomes between those women that underwent Type I surgery
(equivalent to our Category 2) and those that had no surgery

Alles anzeigen

Zitat

Critics of FGA have pointed out that there is no medical
benefit to factor in the risk versus benefit calculus so often used
in medicine and when compared with male circumcision.29
However, up to recently, the medical benefits of male circumci-
sion were also thought to be tenuous, contested or so minor
that circumcision was classified as an elective, cosmetic proced-
ure.1 Thus, disallowing Categories 1 and 2 of FGA because it
lacks medical benefit is an unjust and inappropriate hurdle to
legalisation.

Alles anzeigen

Hat er dafür zu viel Schimpfe bekommen? Weil es ja um "Frauenrechte!!!" geht?

https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/…102375.full.pdf

Siehe auch:

Arora KS, AJ Jacobs: Weibliche genitale Änderung: eine Kompromisslösung