Versuchskaninchen ist das richtige Wort. Man fragt sich, was die WHO dieses mal bekommen hat.
So was ähnliches soll doch auch die berüchtigte Tara Klamp leisten.
"The device clamps on the foreskin so that the blood supply is cut off, and after seven to 10 days the foreskin is supposed to fall off with the clamp, but sometimes the clamp has to be surgically removed. "
Aber man muss halt beide Augen zudrücken:
"In 2009, a randomized controlled trial in Orange Farm, South Africa, found adverse events of 37 percent in the 35 men in the Tara KLamp study, against 3.4 percent in the 34 men in the surgical arm. Men circumcised using the KLamp also reported worse pain. The trial was stopped early due to the unacceptably high rate of adverse events, with the researchers noting that, “given the high rates of adverse events in this study and the low number of available studies, we strongly caution against the use of the TK for young adults, and we recommend careful evaluation of the procedure when performed on children”"
Da wird immer mal was neues probiert. Plastibell wurde ja auch mal hochgelobt.
Gefahren der Plastibell-Methode
Und die Mogen Clamp, die sollte ja auch ganz supi sein:
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/sep/26/he…cision-20110926
"In 2000, Miltex reached a confidential settlement with a North Hollywood couple whose newborn was injured during circumcision, according to their lawyer, Robert Mandell. Last year, a New York judge awarded $10.8 million in damages to a Florida couple whose son lost the head of his penis when he was circumcised with a Mogen clamp during a Jewish ceremony called a brith milah, or bris. The maker of that device, Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York, already was in default on a $7.5-million judgment in Massachusetts."
"in default", da wird wohl nicht mehr zu holen sein
Für irgend wen lohnt sich dieser Mist immer, und wenn es die Anwälte sind.
Aber wenn es hinterher heißt: "Oh Scheiße, dumm gelaufen" - dann bekommen Afrikaner garantiert keine Millionenbeträge.
