Jewish Women Move Into a Male Domain: Ritual Circumcision

    "“It’s sort of like, I am a mohel, I am open for business, I am going to advertise on Facebook, I am going to get clients. It isn’t how we tend to think about opportunities for rabbis,” Rabbi Linzer said. “There are babies born every day, and if you are doing well, you can make a nice living.”

    Ja, man kann schon prima davon Leben, Kinder zu verletzen.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/28/nyr…hels-women.html

    Zitat

    The job these days does come with occasional harassment, Dr. Blake said. It’s “anti-Semitism merged with anti-circumcision,” she explained.

    Who harasses who?

    Indeed, as the history of female circumcision suggests, if male circumcision
    were confined to developing nations, it would by now have emerged as an in-
    ternational cause celebre, stirring passionate opposition from feminists, physicians, politicians, and the global human rights community. If routine medical
    circumcision didn't exist today, no one would dare to invent it.

    David Gollaher

    "Jewish Women Move Into a Male Domain: Ritual Circumcision"

    Als ich den Titel zuerst gelesen habe, dachte ich schon, dass jüdische Feministinnen jetzt auch beschnitten werden wollen, wegen der Geschlechtergerechtigkeit.

    Man weiß ja heute nie.

    Indeed, as the history of female circumcision suggests, if male circumcision
    were confined to developing nations, it would by now have emerged as an in-
    ternational cause celebre, stirring passionate opposition from feminists, physicians, politicians, and the global human rights community. If routine medical
    circumcision didn't exist today, no one would dare to invent it.

    David Gollaher

    Zitat

    Anti-circumcision activists have pounced on a New York Times feature article about female mohels, flocking to the comments section to describe Jewish ritual circumcision as “barbaric,” “primitive,” “child abuse,” and “mutilation.”

    Warum sind eigentlich alle Leser, die da ihre Meinung äußern gleich "Aktivisten"? Und wer ist Ira Stoll?

    Ein altbekannter Pro-Genitalverstümmelungs-Aktivist und Anti-NYT-Aktivist. Und auch noch Klima-Erwärmungs-Relativierer (da reicht ihm schon ein einzelner kalter Winter) .Man google einfach mal nach Ira Stoll und "circumcision" bzw New York Times. Ganz klar, ein Aktivist allererster Kajüte.
    Ist er sauer, dass er es nie bis zur New York Times geschafft hat? :D

    Die Anti-Kinderrechtskommentare die "Times Pick" waren, erwähnt Stoll natürlich nicht, z.B:

    Zitat von Times Pick

    Folks, it's not mutilation. It's not barbaric. It's safe.

    usw...

    Zitat

    I mention all this simply to say male circumcision is not only a Jewish practice, and lots of men seem to prefer it.

    LOL, es wir doch keiner gefragt!

    Indeed, as the history of female circumcision suggests, if male circumcision
    were confined to developing nations, it would by now have emerged as an in-
    ternational cause celebre, stirring passionate opposition from feminists, physicians, politicians, and the global human rights community. If routine medical
    circumcision didn't exist today, no one would dare to invent it.

    David Gollaher

    Ho-Ho-Ho, in einem Kommentar im Algemeiner wird die New York Times sogar zum "Sturmer" gemacht.... *plonk*
    Obwohl sie einen so wohlmeinenden Artikel über eine "Beschneiderin" verfasst haben.

    Kein Nazi-Vergleich ist zu abstrus, Kniesehnenreflexe gibt's, da wird einem ganz anders.

    Der Algemeiner sollte die "Hate-Speech" gegen die Kollegen von der NYT vielleicht doch etwas im Zaum halten, das sieht auch für den Algemeiner nicht gut aus.

    Indeed, as the history of female circumcision suggests, if male circumcision
    were confined to developing nations, it would by now have emerged as an in-
    ternational cause celebre, stirring passionate opposition from feminists, physicians, politicians, and the global human rights community. If routine medical
    circumcision didn't exist today, no one would dare to invent it.

    David Gollaher

    Schön auch die Unterstellung, daß wer gegen Beschneidung sei, kein Problem mit FGM habe. Das ist so gaga, da fällt einem nichts mehr zu ein.

    Zumal GGM ja nur dort praktiziert wird, wo auch BGM praktiziert wird.

    Indeed, as the history of female circumcision suggests, if male circumcision
    were confined to developing nations, it would by now have emerged as an in-
    ternational cause celebre, stirring passionate opposition from feminists, physicians, politicians, and the global human rights community. If routine medical
    circumcision didn't exist today, no one would dare to invent it.

    David Gollaher

Jetzt mitmachen!

Sie haben noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registrieren Sie sich kostenlos und nehmen Sie an unserer Community teil!

Benutzerkonto erstellen Anmelden