http://www.neontommy.com/news/2013/12/p…t-immunity-aids
Unfortunately, the corollary of such an over-simplified message is that circumcision is a green light for sexual activity, even though circumcised men can still have HIV and they most certainly can still pass it on. </BR>
In tiny print at the bottom of the poster, almost too small to see, is a warning from the Ministry of Health Advisory stating that having sex without condoms still puts men at risk, even with circumcision.
...
Deluding millions of men into thinking their lack of foreskin makes them immune to AIDS? Probably going to contribute pretty heavily to the spread of AIDS.</BR>The last paragraph of the Times article mentions that some men who test positive for HIV still opt to have the circumcision procedure. While I hope this choice isn't motivated by the desire to appear “clean” to potential partners and score unprotected sex, circumcision myths propagated by careless “public health” campaigns do clear the way for the success of this despicable strategy.
Genau das ist der Punkt. Es sollen möglichst viele Männer beschnitten werden. Ein AIDS_Text zuvor könnte den Infizierten das ersparen. Denn, was haben die von einer Absenkung des Risikos?