"A good place to start would be telling the truth."

    Da dämmert es offenbar jemandem, dass verlogen argumentiert wird:

    Zitat

    Slaughtering an animal by the traditional Jewish method is certainly much more painful than more modern ways of animal slaughter, and cutting off a bit of a newborn’s penis is a violation of his human rights. These are simple facts and we have to find a way of justifying them, not closing our eyes and claiming they don’t exist. A case can be made for ancient Jewish customs in the 21st Century, but it requires first of all a degree of honesty.

    http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/jerusa…remium-1.532483

    Diesen Haaretz-Korrespondenten, Anshel Pfeffer, sollte man im Auge behalten.

    Zitat

    "Here are three cliches about circumcision. First, that it is a sacred covenant between God and the Jewish people. The fact is that whether or not you believe in the biblical narrative of Abraham and his sons, this is hardly a unique Jewish custom. Every day around the world, thousands of babies, young boys and fully grown men have their foreskins removed in a wide variety of rituals and medical procedures. Only a small minority of them are Jews and even among Jews, most are not doing it out of religious conviction, but for reasons of social necessity, family and peer pressures and because it’s a good excuse for having a big party.
    Second, being circumcised is good for your health. While there is research that points to certain health benefits, there are opposing studies which purport to prove that tampering with male genitalia causes trauma, impaired sexual function and carries well-documented risks. This conflicting medical evidence is hardly surprising – doctors are also partisans, who are every bit as biased as newspaper columnists when it comes to marshaling the facts.
    The third cliche is that circumcision is a hallowed religious custom and in a democracy, people should be allowed to observe their traditions without politicians or courts intervening. This is normally an argument for which I have a great deal of sympathy. I don’t want the government telling me how to live my life. Except for the fact that it’s not my life. None of my four sons were asked in advance when, at the age of eight days, intense, intimate pain was inflicted upon them, and their private parts irrevocably changed. Hardly a democratic act."



    http://www.mesop.de/2012/07/16/the…nd-other-myths/



    Siehe auch hier:

    Israel must stop overplaying the Holocaust card
    http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/…t-card-1.364297

    "Man muss diese versteinerten Verhältnisse dadurch zum Tanzen zwingen, dass man ihnen ihre eigne Melodie vorsingt!" K.M.

    Vielen Dank für die links, bin grade erst darauf gestossen.

    Ich kann mich Marias Kommentar nur anschliessen.

    Art. 2 GG:
    (2) Jeder hat das Recht auf Leben und körperliche Unversehrtheit. Geschuldet der deutschen Vergangenheitsbewältigung gilt dieses Grundrecht ausdrücklich nicht, wenn die Person a) ein Kind und b) männlich ist, c) die Eltern entweder jüdischen oder muslimischen Glaubens sind und d) das kindliche Genital das Ziel der Versehrtheit ist.

    Zitat von werner

    Israel must stop overplaying the Holocaust card

    Ich hoffe wir können bald lesen "Israel must stop playing the Holocaust card".
    Oder was soll das "over"?

    • Toleranz wird zum Verbrechen, wenn sie dem Bösen gilt (Thomas Mann)

Jetzt mitmachen!

Sie haben noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registrieren Sie sich kostenlos und nehmen Sie an unserer Community teil!

Benutzerkonto erstellen Anmelden