... because it’s recognised that the foreskin has a functional role

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

    • ... because it’s recognised that the foreskin has a functional role

      Paediatrician Dr Paul Bauert says the Royal Australasian College of Physicians believes the frequency of diseases modifiable by circumcision (penile cancer, HIV, STIs, UTIs) and the complication rates don’t warrant routine infant circumcision in Australia and New Zealand. And, he says, “ethical and human rights concerns have been raised regarding elective infant male circumcision because it’s recognised that the foreskin has a functional role”.
      That functional role includes a dispute over how many nerve endings the foreskin has to enhance sexual function and pleasure (estimates vary between 20,000 and 100,000, making it the most sensitive part of the penis and an erogenous zone). But Chapin says: “How many nerve endings would make it OK? The body is designed that way, for that sexual function.”
      Zeldis has a theory as to why: “The majority of circumcised men tell themselves it was good for them. The alternative to that denial involves admitting you were harmed and sexually maimed as a child in one of your most sensitive areas.“Many men don’t want to psychologically deal with that. It’s overwhelming.
      theguardian.com/society/2019/j…-infant-male-circumcision

      There is no skin like foreskin