There are plenty of legitimate reasons to oppose the practice of infant male circumcision....However,...

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

    • There are plenty of legitimate reasons to oppose the practice of infant male circumcision....However,...

      There are plenty of legitimate reasons to oppose the practice of infant male circumcision. Not all sceptics of circumcision are intactivists, and not all intactivists rely on hyperbole, misogyny and misinformation to make their case. However, as the limitlessness of this restorer’s pursuit implies, intactivists are, at their core, concerned with any apparent barriers to pleasure.
      Aha, VA ist also eine Barriere für den sexuellen Genuss. Wenigstens mal klar gesagt.


      ...the contemporary superego, argues Žižek, subjects us to unceasing imperatives to “Enjoy!” We should have sex every night to keep the oxytocin flowing; masturbate to fight menstrual cramps; and for a healthy prostate, try anal beads. No longer prudish, today’s pop-cultural authorities induce us to maximise our pleasure for our own as well as society’s good.
      Hä? :rolleyes:


      We wind up accepting a pro-pleasure or “sex-positive” ethos only to find ourselves faced with a relentless pressure that no amount of sex, shopping, or social media activity seems to discharge.
      Hm, wenn ich jetzt so an z.B. Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Roman Polanski, "Paolo Pinkel", Rolf Eden, James Levine... denke - VA scheint da gar nichts zu nützen. Vielleicht ist das ja auch so: je weniger Genuss beim Akt, desto mehr wollen manche? Qualitätskompensation durch Quantität?


      Intactivists present some of the more vulgar examples of how we all fall prey to this cultural ideal of maximum enjoyment:
      Wie, was ist vulgär daran, wenn man einfach nur das haben möchte, was einem die Natur zugedacht hatte? Es geht nicht um "maximieren" - warum soll man überhaupt das natürliche "enjoyment" verringern?


      “If the practising psycho-analyst asks himself on account of what disorder people most often come to him for help, he is bound to reply … that it is psychical impotence,” wrote Sigmund Freud in his paper
      Wenn man schon Sigmund Freud zitiert sollte man auch erwähnen, dass Freud seine Söhne ganz gelassen hat!

      Und dann diese dämliche Assoziation von "Incels" mit Intaktivisten.. <X

      Da scheint jemand ganz auf der Linie von Maimonides zu sein.

      novaramedia.com/2022/02/14/why…-about-male-circumcision/
      Ein Erwachsener weiß sich seiner Haut zu wehren.
      Ein Kind aber kann das nicht. Ein Rechtsstaat muss sich schützend vor Kinder stellen.