OK, das kommt dann noch oben drauf.
Das ist der Gipfel der Perversität. Zum einen gesteht man nur Frauen ein Recht auf einen vollständigen Körper zu, Männern nicht. Zum anderen sollen Frauen dann entscheiden ob Männer verstümmelt werden.
Beiträge von Selbstbestimmung
-
-
Es ist weder die Entscheidung der Mutter, noch des Vaters, noch beider zusammen. Es ist die Entscheidung des Babys. Das Baby will intakt bleiben. Darauf ist bei ihm alles programmiert. Deswegen strampelt es, deswegen schreit es. Ältere Kinder wollen auch in aller Regel intakt bleiben. Es ist selten, das sie sich mit Absicht selbst verletzen/verstümmeln, und wenn, dann ist es ein sehr ernste Krankheitszeichen.
Eltern haben normalerweise einen Schutzinstinkt gegenüber ihren Kindern.
Und das ist das wundersame an der "erblichen Kindsverstümmelung" - das dieser eigentlich starke Reflex ausgehebelt wird, der ewige Täter-Opfer-Kreislauf. Nach dem Motto: "man muss manchmal auch grausam sein". -
A Qualitative Study on the Low Utilization of Male Circumcision Services in Kwaluseni, Swaziland
Alfred Khehla Wayne Adams
ZitatThe DHS (2006) of Swaziland also reported that HIV prevalence among circumcised men is 22% and 20% for uncircumcised men. It is argued that this was probably due to the fact that those who were circumcised had not removed their entire foreskin as it is done in medical settings. I find this explanation not credible. In Swaziland, the so called ‘bush circumcisions’ are extremely rare. MC is mostly offered in medical settings so the majority of those who were circumcised were circumcised by medical professionals and they normally remove the whole foreskin.
ZitatFindings from the 18 countries with data present a mixed picture of the association between male circumcision and HIV prevalence. In eight of the countries (Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Côte d’Ivoire, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Kenya, and Uganda), HIV prevalence is higher among men who are not circumcised, although the difference between circumcised and non-circumcised men is slight, except in Kenya, where the difference is substantial (HIV prevalence of 11.5 percent for non-circumcised men compared with 3.1 percent for circumcised men). In 10 of the countries—Cameroon, Guinea, Haiti, Lesotho, Malawi, Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe—HIV prevalence is higher among circumcised men.
ZitatCumulative probabilities of female HIV infection at 24 months were 21·7% (95% CI 12·7-33·4) in the intervention group and 13·4% (6·7-25·8) in the control group (adjusted hazard ratio 1·49, 95% CI 0·62-3·57; p=0·368) (Wawer et al. 2009). From this trial, it means that MC increases the probability of male to female HIV transmission if the male is circumcised while HIV positive.For some reason, results from such studies seem to be obfuscated and MC campaigns in Swaziland do not warn women about this. I find this ethically wrong.
ZitatThe authors concluded that “among uncircumcised men who intended to get circumcised in the future,72.4% intended to get circumcised in the next 12 months” (PSI 2010:6). I argue that their study suffered from desirability bias.
PSI is arguably one of the leading NGOs in the country in providing MC and other HIV prevention interventions.ZitatAlso, in some cases PSI and other NGOs implementing MC have used incentives to lure males to come for MC.
ZitatEven more worrisome, circumcised men were more likely to report a high number of lifetime partners. This indicates that this feeling of security is transformed into dangerous practices.
ZitatSince most of the circumcised men stated that MC actually decreases their sensitivity during sex, they argued that there were other ways to improve their sex life. These strategies ranged from using lubricants during sex, trying different sex positions and not using condoms for better sensitivity. According to both circumcised and uncircumcised men, the penis head gets harder and consequently less sensitive. The notion that the penis head gets keratinized (Dinh et al. 2010) sparked more response from the uncircumcised men. An uncircumcised male who had just completed his high school education said:
Those that are circumcised say that in bed it is good for the woman to sleep with a circumcised man. But for you as a male it is not nice. This means you are doing it for the woman. You know as a guy the foreskin can play tricks on you and you ejaculate quickly before the woman reaches climax. So why is the foreskin removed if it helps during sexual intercourse? So without the foreskin it means that you just insert the head and it takes a long time to sense her and then ejaculate.ZitatYes I would agree with that. I now take longer to ejaculate. And sometimes you can end the sex session while you have not even ejaculated. I am talking through experience and this is painful (a painful experience). Sometimes by the time you finish you find that the woman is already too tired because of my delayed ejaculation. So I would say that the foreskin has a role during sex. My main complaint is delayed ejaculation or not ejaculating at all.
Aber dann:ZitatBut I do not regret too much because I am safer from STIs and I can now easily clean myself.
1. Gefährlicher Irrglauben
2. 2-4 Sekunden pro Tag einsparen, ist das der Bringer?ZitatA friend of mine lied to me and he said after getting circumcised I would enjoy sex better. Also, the MC Ambassador was telling us that you would enjoy sex better after sex. But now it (penis gland) is almost like rubber and there is no longer that feeling when entering the female.
ZitatPeople have these questions and they accuse MC proponents of not telling the truth about circumcision and only painting a good picture about it. This clearly shows that biomedicine lacks information in this part.
Ab Seite 49 sind da auch ein par grauselige Bilder von Komplikationen.ZitatMost participants (both males and females) seemed to have suspicions regarding HIV interventions. They reported that HIV had become a big business and saw interventions such as MC as part of that business.
Doof sind sie nicht, die Swasis.
ZitatTo my surprise, most of my findings were not in harmony with the literature reviewed. For example, fear of loss of sexual pleasure was not found in most literature reviewed in this study.
Das wundert mich überhaupt nicht. Was den Verstümmelisten nicht in den Kram passt, wird unterdrückt.
-
Zitat
65.6% of participants had used a condom at
last sexual intercourse. Condom use began to decline eight months
after the circumcision. At eight months, condom use had declined to
54.8% and to 52.1% at 12 months (p<0.001).http://www.malecircumcision.org/country_update…s/HATIP_205.pdf
-
Könnte vielleicht interessant sein:
Sexual Organs and Society
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-40006-3_6
-
Zitat
This case stresses the importance of adherence to instructions and appropriate follow up when prescribing medication even for topical use.
Instructions? Emla hat gar keine Zulassung für Vorhaut-Amputationen!
ZitatEMLA cream should be used judiciously due to its possible risk of immediate allergic reaction.
Also besser ganz ohne Minimal-Betäubung? Offenbar, denn man hat ja gewartet, bis die Schwellung zurückging - und damit auch die sowieso unzureichende Wirkung von Emla.
http://www.npplweb.com/wjmscr/fulltext/2/7
ZitatThe risks of the anesthetic chosen should be carefully weighed against its benefits, seeing as the whole procedure as customarily performed, can be completed in 10-15 seconds under experienced hands. This is what raises debate over the necessity of a transient anesthetic effect.
Aha, Nachtigall...
-
-
Die haben aber doch nur 100 Männer befragt? Da kann jetzt einer selbstverstümmelungsmanisch gewesen sein, wäre 1%.
Oder keiner, wären 0%.
Kommt das durch irgendwelche Gewichtsfaktoren (Randomisierung)? -
... einer von 2000...
Wieso 2000? Wo steht da was von 2000? Da steht:
ZitatThe cross -sectional descriptive survey collected data from a simple random sample of 100 students.
-
Sollten die etwa ihre Vorhaut schätzen gelernt haben?
ZitatAmong the respondents, was 16.9% who were circumcised and only 0.05% were willing to be circumcised
Hm, - 100 Befragte - 1% wäre einer - aber es sollte sich nur ein 1/20-Mann verstümmeln lassen?

-
Zitat
Mt. Sinai in New York.
A worker who preferred to remain unnamed was kind enough to answer. The following is paraphrased, not quoted.
In the case of a dispute between mother and father as to whether a child is circumcised when there’s evident disagreement, paperwork takes precedence. Approval for the procedure requires the signature of one parent and a witness, typically a hospital staff member. Should either parent be the first to bring the paperwork to the desk to have the procedure performed, once it is witnessed by a hospital staff member, this will take precedence. In the case of an obvious disagreement (where two people are arguing before the staff member) the mother’s choice is likely to take precedence.
http://francisdroy.wordpress.com/2014/03/02/cir…th-who-decides/
-
-
Zitat
Senator raises dust over circumcision
-
Zitat
Sadly this appears to be yet another example of the further erosion of African culture and tradition by the callous overseers of Westminster.
In Africa, the practice of FGE is an integral part of a young girl's preparation for womanhood and a symbol of her purity.
-
Deutsche Sprache schwer:
ZitatDie Beschneidung-Bibliothek legt nahe, dass EMLA sehr effektiv ist bei
der Bekämpfung von etwas von dem Schmerz, die dieses Verfahren begleitet
(Benini, Johnson, Faucher, et al., n/a EMLA ist auch unter dem
Gattungsnamen Prilocain und Lidocain erhältlich.
http://www.arveno.info/aktuelle-schme…schneidung.htmlZitatWie jede politisierten Sprache hatte die Verwendung Intactivist Begriffe wie “männliche Genitalverstümmelung” eine starke Gegenreaktion pro Beschneidung Parteien.
-
Zitat von Suchende
ich habe eben gekuckt, ob unter dem taz-Artikel eine Kommentarfunktion steht - nichts gefunden.
Da ist eine Bezahlfunktion. Vielleicht musst du erst zahlen, bevor du kommentieren darfst?
Ich vermute eher, die taz ist die "aber die MGM!"-Kommentare leid, sie passen nicht in das Konzept (Frauen- vor Männerrechte, Multikulti-über-alles) der taz.
Sonst könnte man ja glatt einiges dazu vorbringen:
Zitat“I have problems with circumcised men because they do not want to use condoms. They always argue that because they have been circumcised they did not need to use condoms,” said the heavily pregnant Memory, who is also HIV-positive.
Memory said even after disclosing her HIV status, they still insisted on sleeping with her without any form of protection.
http://www.thestandard.co.zw/2013/11/10/cir…xual-behaviour/
ZitatTanzania: Male Cut Programme Bears Fruit in Kagera
...Kagera HIV/AIDS infection rate rises
bzw.: Kagera HIV/AIDS infection rate risesZitatMultivariate findings supported the conclusion that intact men may use condoms more frequently...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23514832
ZitatIn 2008 85.2% of males between 15 and 24 said they were using a condom during their last sexual encounter, but only 67.4% reported doing so in 2012. ...
...almost a million South African men between 15 and 49 have been medically circumcised since the department launched its medical circumcision campaign in April 2010.
...
The proportion of South Africans infected with HIV has increased from 10.6% in 2008 to 12.3% in 2012, according to the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC).http://mg.co.za/article/2013-0…lence-increases
ZitatViele Männer haben sich jedoch für immer von Kondomen verabschiedet, nachdem sie sich einer Beschneidung unterzogen hatten.
http://www.spiegel.de/gesundheit/dia…a-a-904302.html
Zitat"Circumcision is significant in explaining condom use, where
circumcised men are less likely to have used condoms during their
last sexual
encounter.http://cssr.uct.ac.za/sites/cssr.uct…/pubs/WP273.pdf
Zitat"Dr. Wawer found that 18% of the women in her study contracted
HIV/AIDS from circumcised men, compared to 12% of women who
contracted it from uncircumcised men.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ali-a-rizvi/ma…ision-and-the_b
_249728.html -
Zitat
Nach wie vor "null Toleranz"!
Gemeinsam für das Recht auf Unversehrtheit. "Natürlich" nur für Frauen!
ZitatGemeinsam für das Recht der Frauen auf Unversehrtheit
http://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/Art…tuemmelung.html
-
Trotz aller Versuche, das Thema nach Verabschiedung des §1631d BGB unter den Teppich zu kehren - lt. Schnarrenberger sollte doch nun endlich Friede Freude Eierkuchen einkehren- die Medien geben immer noch keine Ruhe!
ZitatKöstlich der Sketch "Gerichtsverhandlung", bei dem die erstaunte Oberpleiser Weiblichkeit erfuhr, was sich so alles in der örtlichen Kreissparkasse abspielt. Yvonne Baltes, Birgit Landsberg, Monika Adams, Ulrike Binot, Gisa Schulte-Gläser, Britta Friedrich und Margret Schuster spielten mit. Dabei ging es um eine Anklage wegen "ritueller Beschneidung", sprich drei Frauen hatten einem Nicht-Rheinländer den Schlips abgeschnitten.
Haaa-Haaa-Haaa, ja wirklich köstlich!
(würg)http://www.general-anzeiger-bonn.de/region/rhein-s…cle1281384.html
-
Zitat von Wakankar
Oder ist die Verzögerung des Abschlußberichtes so ungewöhnlich, daß sie in Zusammenhang mit Beratung und Verabschiedung des § 1631d BGB gestanden haben könnte?
Timing ist alles, das habe ich bei dieser ganzen Entwicklung schon des öfteren gedacht. Z.B. auch bei der geänderten AAP-Empfehlung (passen zur Debatte im Bundestag) bzw. bei der Verzögerung der Veröffentlichung der Replik der europäischen Ärzte.
-
Ganz böse Sache, das:
ZitatTherefore, it commands all who glory in the name of Christian, at whatever time, before or after baptism, to cease entirely from circumcision, since, whether or not one places hope in it, it cannot be observed at all without the loss of eternal salvation.
Zitat...circumcision was deemed to be a mortal sin
Die Sache hat nur einen Schönheitsfehler: man schrieb das Jahr 1441....

http://www.ccjr.us/dialogika-reso…hip/669-eugene4
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Florence
Heute hört sich das ganz anders an. Die dt. Bischofskonferenz hatte das Kölner Urteil scharf kritisiert.
ZitatDass die Beschneidung dem Wohl des Kindes widerspricht und ihm oder dem späteren Erwachsenen einen Schaden zufügt, wird von den Richtern jedoch lediglich behauptet.
http://www.dbk.de/presse/details…dce23918d4a197f
Galilei hat man mit 400 Jahren Verspätung rehabilitiert, aber nicht alles ist besser geworden...