Beiträge von Selbstbestimmung

  • Beschneidungsindustrie entdeckt neuen Markt

    Zitat

    Recent studies found that NMC was rarely performed in Thailand..

    Ei, so was! Eine MARKTLÜCKE!


    Zitat

    Unfortunately, MC is not considered desirable by all boys and young men and acceptance rates range from 29% in Uganda to 87% in Swaziland of surveyed African men

    Frechheit! Die wollen das einfach nicht! Trotz eingehender Beschwatzung durch jungen Damen (die Fangprämien bekommen) und "Incentives"

    Zitat

    Recruitment of patients is easier as most babies are born in health care settings.

    Viel einfacher! Babys braucht man ja gar nicht zu fragen!

    Zitat

    Major concerns included possible medical complications of NMC, infringement of child rights, and lack of understanding from staff and parents.

    Zitat

    Conclusions...
    There is significant preparation that needs to be done before NMC can be introduced in the country.

    Man beachte die Literaturreferenzen, da ist alles dabei, Auvert, Bailey, Moses, Krieger, Tobian, Gray....


    Zitat

    However, the majority (~ 90%) Buddhist population does not practice either MC or child circumcision. So, one would presume that the general population is not familiar with the benefits or complications of NMC.

    Dafür kennen die die Vorteile und den Nutzen eines intakten Genitals.


    Zitat

    A nurse stated that

    “Don’t agree, I don’t agree. I feel bad for the infants. It causes them pain and may create long-term bad memories, which we might not know about. It also violates the child’s rights. We don’t know what they would feel in the future”

    So einen Quatsch muss man denen natürlich noch ausreden, wozu gibt es ausgebuffte PR-Agenturen?

    Zitat

    This education should make the case that NMC is preferable to MC performed at a later age because recovery is faster,...

    Bullshit, darum geht es nicht. Babys können nicht widersprechen, that's all, folks!

    Diese Leute sind regelrecht besessen davon, alles Männliche in der Welt zu verstümmeln... *Brech*

    https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-018-3093-y

    Zitat von Sokrates

    Ich hätte den Thread betitelt mit: "Beschneidungsindustrie entdeckt neuen Markt".

  • Outcome of topical steroid application in children with non-retractile prepuce

    Makhija D1, Shah H1, Tiwari C1, Dwiwedi P1, Gandhi S1.


    Zitat


    Abstract
    True phimosis is overdiagnosed due to the failure to distinguish it from physiological phimosis, which is a normal developmental non retractability of the foreskin. The non-retractile prepuce in children is a cause of parental anxiety and concern. This leads to the majority of the children undergoing surgical procedures. Pathological phimosis needs to be differentiated from physiologic phimosis to avoid unnecessary circumcision. In recent years, topical steroid application use in cases of non-retractile prepuce has shown a good success rate and is well accepted by the parents. It has low risks, is cost effective and avoids anaesthetic and surgical complications. This is an observational study of 100 children with non-retractile foreskin who were managed by local application of topical steroid cream (0.1% Mometasone) over a period of 6 weeks. The non-retractibility was classified according to Kikiro's classification. These patients were analyzed on the basis of age at presentation, complaints at the first presentation, grade of phimosis at first presentation (as per Kikiro's classification), results of the topical steroid application as assessed at 6 weeks after starting application and after stopping of the steroid administered for 6 weeks. The results were analyzed on the basis of the resolution of symptoms and the decrease in Kikiro's grade. Those patients in whom there was no response to treatment or who developed recurrence after stopping steroid treatment underwent circumcision. A total of 19 patients required surgical intervention in the form of circumcision. The use of topical steroids yields satisfactory results in patients with a non-retractile prepuce. It could be a first-line treatment for management in such cases and is an effective alternative designed to avoid unnecessary circumcision.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29641424

  • A HOLISTIC APPROACH TO PHIMOSIS IN CHILDREN

    Zitat

    Phimosis is described as condition in which prepuce or foreskin of glans penis is not retracted backwards resulting in poor narrowed stream of urine during micturition causing ballooning of prepuce along with recurrent attacks of balanoposthitis and Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs). Majority of new born boys do have non-retractile foreskin called as Physiological Phimosis. In Ayurveda phimosis is described as Nirudhaprakasha. Physiological phimosis usually does not require any kind of treatment as it resolve spontaneously within first couple of years mostly taking 3 to 6 years after which measures are considered to correct it surgically. Pathological phimosis is condition in which prepuce get adhered to glans secondary to adhesions or scarring made because of infection, inflammation or trauma. Pathological phimosis and physiological phimosis with recurrent attack of balanoposthitis and UTIs do require treatment. There are several treatment modalities are available according to severity of adhesions such as local application of steroid cream or oil, manual retraction, dilatation and Circumcision. In this review article we assess the various treatment modalities available in Ayurveda and contemporary medical science for better management of Phimosis.


    http://www.jaims.in/index.php/jaims/article/view/508

  • Iceland MPs propose ban on circumcision of boys

    Die Lobby-Arbeit pro-Kinderverstümmelung geht bienenfleißig weiter:


    https://www.agensir.it/europa/2018/04…eSpeed=noscript

  • "Eine Vorhaut ist kein Kopftuch, das man einfach an- und ablegen kann."

    Zitat von Autorin Sonja Fatma Bläser

    Nun darf man ja in das Erziehungsrecht der Eltern nur eingreifen, wenn das Kinderwohl gefährdet ist. Kann man das Kopftuch so einordnen?

    Ja, das Kopftuch gefährdet das Kindeswohl. Genau deshalb muss der Staat handeln. Aber dann müsste man doch sicher auch sagen: Die Beschneidung eines kleinen Jungen gefährdet das Kindeswohl mindestens genauso, oder?

    Ja. Die Beschneidung sollte auch verboten werden. Auf den Jungen liegt doch auch dieser furchtbare Druck: Wer nicht beschnitten ist, ist kein richtiger Mann. Der kann in der Dusche vor den anderen nicht bestehen. Es gibt Menschen, die fragen den Metzger ihres Halal-Fleisches, ob er denn auch „rein“ ist! Viele junge Männer haben uns schon gesagt, dass sie sich nicht hätten beschneiden lassen, wenn sie selbst hätten entscheiden dürfen.

  • "Eine Vorhaut ist kein Kopftuch, das man einfach an- und ablegen kann."

    https://www.finanzen.net/nachricht/akti…aedchen-6100084

  • Norwegen: Forderungen nach Verbot von BGM

    Was für eine Polemik! Selbst die Samen müssen dafür herhalten.

    Zitat

    I do not argue for circumcision

    Ja selbstverständlich nicht, es hatte ja auch nie jemand vor, eine Mauer zu bauen


    Zitat

    I know that the entire SV party leadership has fought like lions against the decision

    Ach angeblich war doch die Hälfte dafür:

    Zitat

    The central board was divided in the middle, five voted in favor and five voted against.

  • Norwegen: Forderungen nach Verbot von BGM

    TÄTÄ! TÄTÄ! *Tusch* *Fanfare*

    (alles Google-Übersetzung)

    Zitat von Google-Übersetzung

    SV goes for age limit for circumcision

    Zitat

    It was decided with 18 votes against 16 at SV's national board meeting in Oslo on Saturday.

    Zitat

    Despite the fact that SV's leader quartet was opposed, SV's country council adopted on Saturday that the party will be in favor of a 15-year limit for ritual circumcision of boys.

    Zitat

    "This is primarily an important decision for the children. We will now settle down with the affected, Child Ombudsman and experts to see how this can be done as quickly as possible, he says. - This is an age limit, not a ban. We must ensure both children's right to self-determination and freedom of religion, he adds.

    Wobei ich nicht verstehe, warum Snorre Valen jetzt auf einmal wieder dagegen ist? ?(

    15 Jahre ist eigentlich noch zu niedrig, aber der Spatz in der Hand...

    https://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/sv-gar…aering/69708669

  • Iceland MPs propose ban on circumcision of boys

    Silja Dögg Gunnarsdóttir lässt mit der Antwort nicht auf sich warten:


    Zitat von Silja Dögg Gunnarsdóttir

    I know of no precedent of members of parliament of other countries sending a formal letter to an Icelandic Embassy to have an opinion on matters being discussed in Iceland's Parliament. It would be interesting to know if there is such precedent or whether Icelandic MP's have sent foreign embassies similar messages regarding certain matters. It just looks like they're really overreaching here....
    Icelandic MP's have total freedom to put forward matters that they feel are important to discuss at Parliament to possibly make new laws or change old ones. That's a a part of a democratic discourse and a democratic society,...
    All threats and pressure are politely declined

    :thumbup: :love:

    https://icelandmonitor.mbl.is/news/politics_…_members_urge_/