A new Tuskegee? Unethical human experimentation...

    Diese Seite verwendet Cookies. Durch die Nutzung unserer Seite erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass wir Cookies setzen. Weitere Informationen

    • A new Tuskegee? Unethical human experimentation...

      A new Tuskegee? Unethical human experimentation and Western neocolonialism in the mass circumcision of African men



      Max Fish
      Arianne Shahvisi
      Tatenda Gwaambuka
      Godfrey B. Tangwa
      Daniel Ncayiyana
      Brian D. Earp


      Abstract schrieb:

      Campaigns to circumcise millions of boys and men to reduce HIV transmission are being conducted throughout eastern and southern Africa, recommended by the World Health Organization and implemented by the United States government and Western NGOs. In the United States, proposals to mass‐circumcise African and African American men are longstanding, and have historically relied on racist beliefs and stereotypes. The present campaigns were started in haste, without adequate contextual research, and the manner in which they have been carried out implies troubling assumptions about culture, health, and sexuality in Africa, as well as a failure to properly consider the economic determinants of HIV prevalence. This critical appraisal examines the history and politics of these circumcision campaigns while highlighting the relevance of race and colonialism. It argues that the “circumcision solution” to African HIV epidemics has more to do with cultural imperialism than with sound health policy, and concludes that African communities need a means of robust representation within the regime.
      Volltext:

      onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/dewb.12285
      Vorhaut hat Vorteile. Sonst gäbe es sie nicht.