Man führt schon seit langer Zeit nur Gutes im Schilde: 
Not to be outdone, the Maryland Medical Journal staff also published an article they titled "Circumcision for the correction of sexual crimes among the Negro race." They made no secret of their intention: the black man's foreskin, which they affectedly referred to as a "prepuce", had to go. They wrote, "The brutal and uncontrollable passion of the Negro has been traced to a variety of causes, the chief of which has been referred to as a perversion of his sexual instincts and ungoverned sexual passion. An enlarged prepuce is assigned as the most frequent cause of irritation, and its removal ...will lead to the stopping of sexual crimes and to the moral improvement of the race."
Nein, das kann man wirklich nicht sagen.This was not going to be the last time circumcision would be suggested as a quick fix to problems.
africanexponent.com/post/4749-…-a-disaster-in-the-makingFrom the 6th to the 8th of March 2007, the World Health Organisation, UNAIDS and other international organizations met in Switzerland's Montreux, did not deliberate but simply decided to push medical male circumcision. But there is nothing like a strictly medical circumcision; circumcisions are political. Peter Aggleton has argued, "...male circumcision - like its counterpart female genital mutilation - is nearly always a strongly political act, enacted upon others by those with power..." Those with power, therefore, sat and enacted.
There is no skin like foreskin