Google Übers. schrieb:
...sometimes because it would be medically necessary. But that is seldom the case, professors emphasize. "Parents worry much too quickly, and doctors go along with it because it generates money."
Young parents' concerns are understandable, says professor Piet Hoebeke, urologist at UZ Gent. Understandable, but usually unnecessary. “Many moms and dads panic a bit when their son's foreskin cannot get over the glans. But that is normal until puberty. In one in four boys there is a narrowing or adhesion of the foreskin. That is not a problem in itself, and moreover it usually dissolves automatically during puberty due to hormones, more nightly erections and masturbation. ”
Every year around 60,000 boys are born in our country, compared to 18,000 circumcisions per year, which is almost one in three. “Incredibly many, therefore.”
18.000/a - Wahnsinn!
Google Übers. schrieb:
"It is only necessary if the foreskin is really sick, then you can see bleeding chaps and under the microscope the foreskin is different," says Hoebeke. "But that only happens with less than one percent."
Und wie viele von den angeblich medizinisch indizierten sind in Wahrheit traditionelle?"I fear that the financial factor also plays a role," says Hoebeke. "Roughly estimated, a circumcision yields a hospital around 700 to 1,000 euros."
nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20190310_04243946
Deutscher Bundestag 2013: "Mädchen sind toll, so wie sie sind. Und niemand hat das Recht ihnen weh zu tun und an ihrer Vulva etwas abzuschneiden"
Deutscher Bundestag 2012: "Jungen sind nicht unbedingt toll, so wie sie sind. Und alle Eltern haben das Recht ihnen weh zu tun und an ihrem Penis etwas abzuschneiden"
Deutscher Bundestag 2012: "Jungen sind nicht unbedingt toll, so wie sie sind. Und alle Eltern haben das Recht ihnen weh zu tun und an ihrem Penis etwas abzuschneiden"