Sexual Mutilation of Muslim Girls, Today in the United States

    Diese Seite verwendet Cookies. Durch die Nutzung unserer Seite erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass wir Cookies setzen. Weitere Informationen

    • Sexual Mutilation of Muslim Girls, Today in the United States

      "Sexual Mutilation of Muslim Girls, Today in the United States" - das ist ein anspruchsvoller Titel. Da erwartet man jetzt eigentlich eine ganze Latte von Fällen.

      In Wahrheit wird aber neben Spekulationen (227,887 Women [erwachsene Frauen?] ..at risk) ein einziger Vorfall angeführt:

      In Livonia, Michigan, a suburb of Detroit, nine young Muslim girls, transported
      from Minnesota, Illinois, and elsewhere in Michigan, were all subjected to genital
      mutilation (Belluck, 2018). The girls’ parents, who ordered and paid for the cut-
      ting, and four doctors and clinic employees, were all members of a Shiite Muslim
      sect based in India, the Dawoodi Bohra. They were prosecuted under a 1996 federal
      law that outlawed female genital mutilation in the U.S. But, on November 20, 2018,
      U.S. District Judge Bernard Freidman, ruled the federal law to be unconstitutional
      (Belluck, 2018). The judge’s ruling was based entirely on the matter of jurisdiction.
      He stated that Congress had no authority to address a “local criminal activity,” that
      could only be penalized by state laws. All charges were dismissed against the eight
      adults directly involved in the girls’ mutilations.

      In that vein, if sexual mutilations were being inflicted on males today - if
      any significant number of parents in the U.S. were privately arranging to have their
      sons’ penises sliced off, based on their religious motivations - stopping this atrocity
      would undoubtedly have become an urgent national priority. Muslim girls deserve
      no less care and concern.
      Jungen werden in den USA in ganz anderen Größenordnungen genitalverstümmelt als es bei Mädchen der Fall ist.

      Ist denn den besagten neun Mädchen auch nur ansatzweise etwas widerfahren, was eine Penis-Amputation entsprechen würde?
      Darüber schweigt sich der Artikel von Robert Brannon aus. Aber Robert Brannon ist halt spezialisiert:

      AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY
      Robert Brannon, Ph.D., is a social psychologist at Brooklyn College, City University of
      New York (CUNY), who specializes in issues of gender, violence against women, the
      commercial sex-industry, attitude measurement, and male gender role analysis. He has
      taught courses in women’s studies, the psychology of masculinity, and the psychology of
      prejudice. He is active in the National Organization for Women in New York State, and
      Chairs the National Organization for Men Opposing Sexism (NOMAS) Men's Studies
      Association and the Committee on Feminist Movement History (Nomas.org).
      digitalcommons.uri.edu/cgi/vie…icle=1152&context=dignity
      Vorhaut hat Vorteile. Sonst gäbe es sie nicht.