Cutting male and female genitals are similar:
1) They are unnecessary, extremely painful, and traumatic.
2) They can have adverse sexual and psychological effects.
3) They are generally done by force on children.
4) They are generally supported by local medical doctors.
5) Pertinent biological facts are not generally known where procedures are practiced.
6) They are defended with reasons such as tradition, religion, aesthetics, cleanliness, and health.
7) The rationale has currently or historically been connected to controlling sexual pleasure.
8 ) They are often believed to have no effect on normal sexual functioning.
9) They are generally accepted and supported by those who have been subjected to them.
10) Those who are cut (male and female) have a compulsion to repeat their trauma on their children.
11) The choice may be motivated by underlying psychosexual reasons.
12) Critical public discussion is generally taboo where the procedures are practiced.
13) They can result in serious complications that can lead to death.
14) The adverse effects are hidden by repression and denial.
15) Dozens of potentially harmful physiological, emotional, behavioral, sexual, and social effects on individuals and societies have never been studied.
16) On a qualitative level, cutting the genitals of male and female children are the same. The harm starts with the first cut, any cut.
17) The decision is generally controlled by men, though women may be supportive.
18) They violate the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (both male and female).
19) They generally exist together (male and female circumcision).
20) To stop one, we must stop both. Then we may better develop toward our individual and social potential.

Fuambai Ahmadu schrieb:

Women who have been circumcised - for the most part - support and celebrate this practice

Male circumcision and female circumcision are parallel, are parelell processes

"The difference surely is that in the long run there are no health implications for the male who has been circumcised"