Brian D. Earp: In defence of genital autonomy for children. Journal of Medical Ethics, in press.

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy.

    • Brian D. Earp: In defence of genital autonomy for children. Journal of Medical Ethics, in press.

      Brian D. Earp wrote:

      Brian D. Earp:


      "Abstract:

      Arora and Jacobs (2016) assume that liberal societies should tolerate non-therapeutic infant male circumcision, and argue that it follows from this that they should similarly tolerate—or even encourage—what the authors regard as ‘de minimis’ forms of female genital mutilation (as defined by the World Health Organization). In this commentary, I argue that many serious problems would be likely to follow from a policy of increased tolerance for female genital mutilation, and that it may therefore be time to consider a less tolerant attitude toward non-therapeutic infant male circumcision. Ultimately, I suggest that children of whatever sex or gender should be free from having healthy parts of their most intimate sexual organs either damaged or removed, before they can understand what is at stake in such an intervention and agree to it themselves.

      More Info: Earp, B. D. (in press). In defence of genital autonomy for children. Journal of Medical Ethics, in press.

      Journal Name: Journal of Medical Ethics

      Publication Date: 2016

      Research Interests: Business Ethics, Religion, History, Cultural History, Sociology, and 207 more"

      academia.edu/19117334/In_defen…tal_autonomy_for_children
      "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it"

      "Wer sich nicht an die Vergangenheit erinnern kann, ist dazu verdammt, sie zu wiederholen."


      George Santayana (1863-1952)