Noutopia
1h ago
3 4

"Cruel and barbaric practice", Cameron seems to distinguish between one cruel and barbaric and another cruel and barbaric, as in Fox hunting, badger cull, benefit sanctions, persecution of the sick and disabled all deemed not cruel and barbaric in Cameron's view.
.

5. We will not tolerate .. sexism, .. or other forms of hate-speech, or contributions that could be interpreted as such. We recognise the difference between criticising a particular government, organisation, community or belief and attacking people on the basis of their ... sex, gender, .. or age.

This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards. Replies may also be deleted. For more detail see our FAQs.

dmw9108
13h ago
109 110

Why would you want to mutilate a baby's genitals, male or female?

Take a step back and think about the catastrophic evilness behind such practice. Barbaric. It's child abuse, plain and simple.

The Guardian is sexist as he deletes any comment pointing out that the only way to get rid of FGM in any form is to say no to any forced gential cutting of children at all. That the guardian deletes any comments that points to the medicalisation trials of FGM defenders who direct to the genital mutilation of boys that we do not prosecute, is unbelievable. Shame on you, Guardian. Intact genitals are fundamental human right and covering this sets you in a bad positions. Unbelievable how the Guardian manipulates readers comments.

Guardian newspaper tries to silence victims of genital mutilation, because they are men

We rightly decry female genital mutilation. Why, then, are so many happy to condone the male equivalent?