Aha. Also braucht ein Flugzeug nur ein Triebwerk?Michael Castleman M.A. schrieb:
Opponents Misunderstand the Body and Lovemaking
Circumcision opponents are adamant that the procedure must compromise men’s sexuality. How could it NOT? The foreskin is rich in touch-sensitive nerves. Remove the foreskin and you rob men of nerves that provide sexual pleasure.
This argument is mistaken on two counts:
• The body is redundant. We can get along fine on less than half of one kidney but we have two. One lung suffices, but we have two. Evolution has equipped us with more capacity than we actually need. Evidently, this is also true of the penis.
Consider how it feels to pet a cat with five fingers. You feel the soft luxuriousness of the fur. You feel the cat purr. Now imagine that you lose one finger. After you’re all healed, you pet the cat with four fingers. You have 20 percent fewer touch-sensitive nerves in that hand, but does petting feel any different? The same goes for penile sensitivity. Men don’t need foreskins to enjoy ecstatic lovemaking.
Mit nur einem Lungenflügel hätte man ständig Kurzatmigkeit.
Dieses Argument vom Schlossmann ist so dermaßen schlecht, dass es sogar die Seite gegen Zirkumzision unterstützt.
Try again, Michael Castleman.
