Circumcision had NO protective effect in the prevention of HIV transmission

    Diese Seite verwendet Cookies. Durch die Nutzung unserer Seite erklären Sie sich damit einverstanden, dass wir Cookies setzen. Weitere Informationen

    • Circumcision had NO protective effect in the prevention of HIV transmission

      Oh-oh!
      Jetzt müssen Auvert & Co. aber schnell 10 Gegenstudien fabrizieren....


      Male circumcision and its relationship to HIV infection in South Africa: results of a national survey in 2002
      Nqeketo, A.; Connolly, C.; Simbayi, L.C.; Shanmugam, R.
      the objective of this article is to investigate the nature of male circumcision and its relationship to HIV infection. Method used: analysis of a sub-sample of 3 025 men aged 15 years and older who participated in the first national population-based survey on HIV/AIDS in 2002. Chi-square tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to identify factors associated with circumcision and HIV status, followed by a logistic regression model. One-third of the men (35.3%) were circumcised. The factors strongly associated with circumcision were age >50, black living in rural areas and speaking SePedi (71.2%) or IsiXhosa (64.3%). The median age was significantly older for blacks (18 years) compared with other racial groups (3.5 years), p <0.001. Among blacks, circumcisions were mainly conducted outside hospital settings. In 40.5% of subjects, circumcision took place after sexual debut; two-thirds of the men circumcised after their 17th birthday were already sexually active. HIV and circumcision were not associated (12.3% HIV positive in the circumcised group v. 12% HIV positive in the uncircumcised group). HIV was, however, significantly lower in men circumcised before 12 years of age (6.8%) than in those circumcised after 12 years of age (13.5%, p=0.02). When restricted to sexually active men, the difference that remained did not reach statistical significance (8.9% v. 13.6%, p=0.08.). There was no effect when adjusted for possible confounding. Circumcision had no protective effect in the prevention of HIV transmission. This is a concern, and has implications for the possible adoption of the mass male circumcision strategy both as a public health policy and an HIV prevention strategy.


      ecommons.hsrc.ac.za/handle/123456789/5173

      Und in fast jeder Studie wird dreist und gebetsmühlenartig behauptet: "Male circumcision decreases HIV acquisition by 60%"
      Vorhaut hat Vorteile. Sonst gäbe es sie nicht.